Designing and executing prime editing experiments in mammalian cells

David R. Liu, Jordan L. Doman, Alexander A. Sousa, Peyton B. Randolph, Peter J. Chen

Published: 2022-08-07 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-022-00724-4

Gene editing

Prime editing

Mammalian cells

PegRNA design

PE systems

AI 解读

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

pegRNA and nicking sgRNA sequences used in Fig. 7.

Efficient and safe single-cell cloning of human pluripotent stem cells using the CEPT cocktail

Profiling native pulmonary basement membrane stiffness using atomic force microscopy

Genetic circuit design automation with Cello 2.0

Synthesis of siRNA nanoparticles to silence plaque-destabilizing gene in atherosclerotic lesional macrophages

Scalable dual-omics profiling with single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and mRNA expression sequencing 2 (SNARE-seq2)

A practical guide to scanning light-field microscopy with digital adaptive optics

Effective high-throughput isolation of fully human antibodies targeting infectious pathogens

Improved sampling and DNA extraction procedures for microbiome analysis in food-processing environments

MOF-derived nanoporous carbons with diverse tunable nanoarchitectures

Tutorial: a statistical genetics guide to identifying HLA alleles driving complex disease

查看全部

Sections

Figures

References

Supplementary information

Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824–844 (2020).
Frangoul, H. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 252–260 (2021).
Gillmore, J. D. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 493–502 (2021).
Giannoukos, G. et al. UDiTaSTM, a genome editing detection method for indels and genome rearrangements. BMC Genomics 19, 212 (2018).
Stadtmauer, E. A. et al. CRISPR-engineered T cells in patients with refractory cancer. Science. 367, eaba7365 (2020).
Webber, B. R. et al. Highly efficient multiplex human T cell engineering without double-strand breaks using Cas9 base editors. Nat. Commun. 10, 5222 (2019).
Turchiano, G. et al. Quantitative evaluation of chromosomal rearrangements in gene-edited human stem cells by CAST-Seq. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1136–1147.e5 (2021).
Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).
Song, Y. et al. Large-fragment deletions induced by Cas9 cleavage while not in the BEs system. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 21, 523–526 (2020).
Zuccaro, M. V. et al. Allele-specific chromosome removal after Cas9 cleavage in human embryos. Cell. 183, 1650–1664.e15 (2020).
Alanis-Lobato, G. et al. Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2004832117 (2021).
Leibowitz, M. L. et al. Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing. Nat. Genet. 53, 895–905 (2021).
Enache, O. M. et al. Cas9 activates the p53 pathway and selects for p53-inactivating mutations. Nat. Genet. 52, 662–668 (2020).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Cox, D. B. T., Platt, R. J. & Zhang, F. Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges. Nat. Med. 21, 121–131 (2015).
Chapman, J. R., Taylor, M. R. G. & Boulton, S. J. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 47, 497–510 (2012).
Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).
Nishida, K. et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science. 353, aaf8729 (2016).
Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).
Richter, M. F. et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 883–891 (2020).
Newby, G. A. et al. Base editing of haematopoietic stem cells rescues sickle cell disease in mice. Nature 595, 295–302 (2021).
Koblan, L. W. et al. In vivo base editing rescues Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome in mice. Nature 589, 608–614 (2021).
Newby, G. A. & Liu, D. R. In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing. Mol. Ther. 29, 3107–3124 (2021).
Koblan, L. W. et al. Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1414–1425 (2021).
Kurt, I. C. et al. CRISPR C-to-G base editors for inducing targeted DNA transversions in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 41–46 (2021).
Chen, L. et al. Programmable C:G to G:C genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9-directed base excision repair proteins. Nat. Commun. 12, 1384 (2021).
Yuan, T. et al. Optimization of C-to-G base editors with sequence context preference predictable by machine learning methods. Nat. Commun. 12, 4902 (2021).
Zhao, D. et al. Glycosylase base editors enable C-to-A and C-to-G base changes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 35–40 (2021).
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652.e29 (2021).
Nelson, J. W. et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 402–410 (2022).
Kim, D. Y., Moon, S. B., Ko, J.-H., Kim, Y.-S. & Kim, D. Unbiased investigation of specificities of prime editing systems in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 10576–10589 (2020).
Schene, I. F. et al. Prime editing for functional repair in patient-derived disease models. Nat. Commun. 11, 5352 (2020).
Gao, P. et al. Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression. Genome Biol. 22, 83 (2021).
Jin, S. et al. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1292–1299 (2021).
Habib, O., Habib, G., Hwang, G.-H. & Bae, S. Comprehensive analysis of prime editing outcomes in human embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 1187–1197 (2022).
Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).
Liu, Y. et al. Enhancing prime editing by Csy4-mediated processing of pegRNA. Cell Res. 31, 1134–1136 (2021).
Zhang, G. et al. Enhancement of prime editing via xrRNA motif-joined pegRNA. Nat. Commun. 13, 1856 (2022).
Petri, K. et al. CRISPR prime editing with ribonucleoprotein complexes in zebrafish and primary human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 189–193 (2022).
Chen, B. et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155, 1479–1491 (2013).
Hussmann, J. A. et al. Mapping the genetic landscape of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 184, 5653–5669.e25 (2021).
Spencer, J. M. & Zhang, X. Deep mutational scanning of S. pyogenes Cas9 reveals important functional domains. Sci. Rep. 7, 16836 (2017).
Park, S.-J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in mouse cells and embryos using an enhanced prime editor. Genome Biol. 22, 170 (2021).
Song, M. et al. Generation of a more efficient prime editor 2 by addition of the Rad51 DNA-binding domain. Nat. Commun. 12, 5617 (2021).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 731–740 (2022).
Choi, J. et al. Precise genomic deletions using paired prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 218–226 (2022).
Jiang, T., Zhang, X.-O., Weng, Z. & Xue, W. Deletion and replacement of long genomic sequences using prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 227–234 (2022).
Lin, Q. et al. High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 923–927 (2021).
Zhuang, Y. et al. Increasing the efficiency and precision of prime editing with guide RNA pairs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 29–37 (2022).
Wang, J. Efficient targeted insertion of large DNA fragments without DNA donors. Nat. Methods 19, 25 (2022).
Tao, R. et al. Bi-PE: bi-directional priming improves CRISPR/Cas9 prime editing in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 6423–6434 (2022).
Ioannidi, E. I. et al. Drag-and-drop genome insertion without DNA cleavage with CRISPR-directed integrases. Preprint at BioRxiv http://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.01.466786 (2021).
Lin, Q. et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 582–585 (2020).
Zheng, C. et al. A flexible split prime editor using truncated reverse transcriptase improves dual-AAV delivery in mouse liver. Mol. Ther. 30, 1343–1351 (2022).
Zhi, S. et al. Dual-AAV delivering split prime editor system for in vivo genome editing. Mol. Ther. 30, 283–294 (2022).
Liu, Y. et al. Efficient generation of mouse models with the prime editing system. Cell Discov. 6, 1–4 (2020).
Lin, J. et al. Modeling a cataract disorder in mice with prime editing. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 25, 494–501 (2021).
Böck, D. et al. In vivo prime editing of a metabolic liver disease in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, (2021).
Kim, Y. et al. Adenine base editing and prime editing of chemically derived hepatic progenitors rescue genetic liver disease. Cell Stem Cell. 28, 1614–1624.e5 (2021).
Choi, J. et al. A time-resolved multi-symbol molecular recorder via sequential genome editing. Nature http://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04922-8 (2022).
Erwood, S. et al. Saturation variant interpretation using CRISPR prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 885–895 (2022).
Xu, R., Liu, X., Li, J., Qin, R. & Wei, P. Identification of herbicide resistance OsACC1 mutations via in planta prime-editing-library screening in rice. Nat. Plants 7, 888–892 (2021).
Qian, Y. et al. Efficient and precise generation of Tay–Sachs disease model in rabbit by prime editing system. Cell Discov. 7, 50 (2021).
Jang, H. et al. Application of prime editing to the correction of mutations and phenotypes in adult mice with liver and eye diseases. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 181–194 (2022).
Kim, H. K. et al. Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 198–206 (2021).
Gao, Z., Herrera-Carrillo, E. & Berkhout, B. Delineation of the exact transcription termination signal for type 3 polymerase III. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 10, 36–44 (2018).
Hsu, J. Y. et al. PrimeDesign software for rapid and simplified design of prime editing guide RNAs. Nat. Commun. 12, 1034 (2021).
Hwang, G.-H. et al. PE-Designer and PE-Analyzer: web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR prime editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W499–W504 (2021).
Anderson, M. V., Haldrup, J., Thomsen, E. A., Wolff, J. H. & Mikkelsen, J. G. pegIT – a web-based design tool for prime editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W505–W509 (2021).
Chow, R. D., Chen, J. S., Shen, J. & Chen, S. A web tool for the design of prime-editing guide RNAs. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 190–194 (2021).
Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191 (2016).
Chen, P.-F. et al. Generation and characterization of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from three male and three female patients with CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD). Stem Cell Res. 53, 102276 (2021).

Designing and executing prime editing experiments in mammalian cells

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

推荐阅读